How well has he Democratic Alliance ruled Cape Town? Here is what the data shows
The Democratic Alliance has ruled Cape Town for two decades. Here is what the data actually shows.
Twenty years running the city, seventeen running the province, and a fresh mandate on the ballot this November. Strip away the campaign posters and the counter-slogans, and the numbers tell two stories at once: the best-run government in South Africa, presiding over one of the most violent and unequal places on earth.
The Democratic Alliance has ruled Cape Town since 2006 and the Western Cape since 2009, longer than some of its voters have been alive. No other party in democratic South Africa has held a metro and a province, alone and without a coalition, for anything close to that long. On 4 November 2026 it asks for another five years.
So the question of whether the DA has done a good job is not hypothetical. It has a two-decade paper trail: seventeen years of Auditor-General reports, sixty-eight quarterly labour surveys, crime statistics down to the police station, a housing waiting list, and now a Constitutional Court judgment. This piece works through that paper trail, the numbers the DA prints on its posters and the numbers it leaves off them.
Spoiler: both sets are real. The province where nine out of every ten new South African jobs were created over the past five years is the same province where nine out of every ten of the country's gang murders happen. That single, brutal symmetry is the whole story in miniature, and it is why an honest answer has to hold two truths at once.
The DA governs the Western Cape province and the City of Cape Town, and sits as junior partner in the ANC-led national coalition. On what a province and city directly control, money, water, power, schools, the record is measurably the strongest in South Africa. On crime, which is run from Pretoria, the outcome is catastrophic and the blame contested. On housing, a court has just ruled the DA governments fell short of the Constitution. November is the referendum on that trade-off.
Who is actually in charge, and of what
Before any scorecard, the wiring. South Africa splits government three ways, and in the Western Cape the tiers wear different colours. Nationally, the African National Congress leads the Government of National Unity, the coalition formed after it fell to 40% in 2024; the DA sits inside it with six cabinet posts. Provincially, the Western Cape is the only one of nine provinces the ANC does not run: the DA governs outright under Premier Alan Winde, re-elected in 2024 by 26 votes to 14 in the legislature. And locally, the City of Cape Town, home to some 4.8 million people, is run by Mayor Geordin Hill-Lewis, who in April 2026 also became the DA's national leader and chose to keep the mayoral chain rather than take a cabinet seat.
The reason this wiring matters is that the powers are divided, and the division decides who owns each number that follows. Some things people blame the city for are not the city's to fix. Some things the province boasts about were delivered by the national grid or a good rainy season. Judge the DA on the levers it actually holds.
Police, prosecutors, courts and prisons are national. The SAPS budget, over R120 billion a year, roughly €6.2 billion or $7.3 billion, is spent from Pretoria. The DA province and city can hire supplementary officers and cameras, but they cannot arrest, charge or jail. By contrast, water, electricity distribution, refuse and housing delivery are the city's own job, so on those the DA owns the result cleanly, good or bad.
A one-party province, but the grip is loosening
The Western Cape is the great exception of South African politics. Everywhere else the story of the past decade is the ANC bleeding support. Here the story is a DA majority so durable it has never once needed a coalition partner: 51.5% in 2009, a peak of 59.4% in 2014, then 55.5% and 55.3% in 2019 and 2024. Over the same four elections the ANC's provincial vote more than halved, from around 32% to just 19.6%, and it now holds only 8 of the legislature's 42 seats to the DA's 24.
But look closer at the 2024 number and the durability has a crack in it. The votes leaving the DA are not going to the ANC. They are going to a swarm of smaller parties, the Patriotic Alliance above all, that collectively took 25% of the provincial ballot in 2024, up from 16.6% in 2019, and that compete hardest in the working-class communities the DA has relied on since it consolidated the so-called coloured vote a decade ago. Internal DA polling reported before this year's campaign put its provincial support drifting toward the 50% line, which is exactly why the party's new leader is running for mayor again instead of taking a cabinet seat.
The ledger: audits nobody else can match
Start with the DA's strongest ground, because it really is strong, and because it is the least spinnable evidence available. Every year the Auditor-General grades every municipality in the country on whether public money is properly accounted for. The 2024/25 round, tabled in June 2026, was bleak nationally: only 15% of municipalities earned a clean audit, 45% adopted budgets they could not fund, committing to R288 billion they do not have, 76% submitted financial statements with material misstatements, and irregular expenditure since 2021/22 has piled up to R145 billion. Infrastructure neglect leaked away R14.7 billion in water and R21.6 billion in electricity.
Against that backdrop, the Western Cape looks like a different country. Twenty-five of its 30 municipalities earned unqualified audits, 20 of them clean, the top grade. The province holds 21 of all 39 clean audits handed out nationwide, more than the other eight provinces combined. The Provincial Treasury itself has now logged twelve consecutive clean audits.
Two asterisks, and they matter. First, the City of Cape Town itself slipped a notch in the latest round, from clean to unqualified with findings, after the Auditor-General found the city's Bid Evaluation Committee had not rigorously assessed all tender criteria. Still a good result by national standards, but a regression, and since the city accounts for roughly 70% of provincial spending, the AG flagged it pointedly. Second, five small municipalities remain in real distress: Kannaland has now received a disclaimer two years running and Laingsburg sits at an adverse opinion, the worst grades on the scale. Clean books are the provincial norm, not a universal guarantee.
Audit outcomes are the one metric where every municipality in the country is graded by the same independent referee on the same rules, year after year. On that metric the gap between the DA's heartland and the rest of South Africa is not a talking point. It is the single widest governance gap the Auditor-General measures.
The jobs machine, and its limits
The most arresting number in Premier Winde's 2026 State of the Province address was this: of the 404,712 net jobs South Africa created over the past five years, 360,347 were created in the Western Cape. That is nine out of every ten, from a province holding barely one eighth of the national population. Provincial employment reached 2,883,000 in early 2026, its highest first-quarter level ever recorded, and the RMB/BER business confidence index put the Western Cape at 55 in mid-2026, the only province above the neutral 50 mark, while the national reading slumped to 39.
The unemployment rate tells the same story with a colder edge. At 19.6% in early 2026, the Western Cape's official rate is the lowest of any province and thirteen full points below the national 32.7%. The gap is structural, not cyclical: the province has tracked below the national rate for every one of the past ten years, and its labour force participation rate, around 69%, is the country's highest, meaning the low rate is not an artefact of people giving up the search.
A 19.6% unemployment rate is the best in South Africa and a genuine achievement of the provincial economy. It is also, by any normal standard, a crisis: roughly one working-age resident in five cannot find work, and among the youngest job-seekers the national rate runs above 60%. The province shed 24,000 jobs in the weak first quarter of 2026, alongside a national loss of 345,000. Best in the country is not the same as good.
The softer indicators point the same way. The province opened nine new schools in the past year with 15 more under construction on a R1.5 billion build budget, about €78 million or $92 million, and feeds over 550,000 learners a free meal every school day. The city, meanwhile, is carrying a record R40 billion three-year infrastructure programme, roughly €2.1 billion or $2.4 billion, including a permanent desalination plant at Paarden Eiland, while keeping property rates among the lowest of the metros. Whatever else is true, the basic machinery of government here works, and works at scale.
Water and lights: mostly earned, partly borrowed
Two crises defined the last decade in Cape Town, and the DA claims both as proof of competence. The data supports one claim fully and the other only in part.
The one it owns is water. In early 2018 Cape Town came within weeks of Day Zero, the day the taps would be shut and four million people would queue at 200 collection points for a 25-litre daily ration. It never happened. Through punitive tariffs, pressure management and a remarkable public response, the city cut water demand by about 40% against pre-crisis levels, a saving of roughly 32 billion litres, and rode out the drought until the rains returned. It then set about making sure the bet on rainfall never has to be made again: the New Water Programme is engineering an additional 300 million litres a day from desalination, water reuse and aquifers by 2030, and the water and sanitation capital budget has tripled from about R2 billion to nearly R6 billion a term, with a pledge to replace 100 km of water pipe and 100 km of sewer pipe every year.
Water: the city's win
Demand cut 40%, Day Zero averted, and 300 million litres a day of new, rain-independent supply under construction. Poorer areas still face the sharpest shortages, but the strategic response was the city's own.
Electricity: 98% connected
Cape Town reaches about 98% of households, and through the blackout years its Steenbras pumped-storage scheme routinely spared residents one full load-shedding stage the rest of the country endured.
Buying its way off Eskom
The city procures independent power, runs a cash-for-power scheme letting residents sell electricity back to the grid, and trimmed the latest 9.01% Eskom tariff hike to an average 6.67% for its own customers.
The borrowed credit
National load-shedding ended in May 2025 because Eskom's generation fleet recovered, energy availability up from 54.6% to 65.4%, unplanned losses down from 16.5 GW to 9.1 GW. The city softened the blow for years; Eskom ended the crisis.
On water, the credit is the city's to claim, and the numbers are auditable. On electricity, the picture is mixed: Cape Town genuinely shielded its residents better than any other metro and is steadily reducing its Eskom dependence, but the headline good news, 341 consecutive days without load-shedding by April 2026, was a national recovery the DA did not deliver. A fair scorecard counts the first and discounts the second.
Crime: eleven murders a day
Now the hardest numbers in this article. In the 2024/25 year the Western Cape recorded 4,467 murders. The four quarters since then read 1,148, then 1,160, then 1,157, then 983, that last figure covering just January to March 2026 and celebrated as progress because it was 8% down on the year before. It still works out to eleven people killed every day. Nationally, 5,181 people were murdered in that same quarter, so this one province, with about an eighth of the country's population, accounted for nearly a fifth of its murders. The SAPS Q1 2026/27 release, April to June 2026, published 28 August 2026, has since added another quarter: 1,071 murders in the province, against 1,148 in the same quarter a year earlier.
What distinguishes the Western Cape is not just the volume but the structure of the violence. It is organised. Of the 242 gang-related murders recorded across all of South Africa in the first quarter of 2026, 225 happened here, 93%, and almost all of them within about ten Cape Flats police precincts. The province holds 10 of the country's 30 deadliest police stations; Mfuleni alone logged 53 murders in the quarter, Delft 51, Gugulethu 49. Firearms are the weapon of choice, police confiscated 607 illegal guns and 14,000 rounds in a single quarter, and roughly 7,000 licensed firearms in the province are simply unaccounted for. Extortion has grown into its own killing category: 23 murders in the quarter, including nine people shot dead at a Philippi East shebeen in one protection-racket attack.
This is where the wiring diagram from Section 1 becomes decisive. Policing is national. SAPS answers to a minister in Pretoria, and the DA has spent years demanding devolved investigative powers it does not have. What the province and city did instead was build a parallel layer: the Law Enforcement Advancement Plan, LEAP, deploying provincially funded officers into the six deadliest areas, plus the city's own metro police, who pull over 450 illegal guns off the streets a year. And the DA's central data claim is that where this layer operates, killing falls. In the starkest quarter for comparison, murders in the combined LEAP areas fell 9.4% while the province as a whole rose 9.1%; in three reaction-unit areas the drop was 14.3%, including 56.3% in Steenberg.
The counter-argument, made by Cape Flats community coalitions and worth stating at full strength, is that the LEAP chart proves less than it seems. Displacement is real: saturate Delft and the shooting moves to Mfuleni, which duly became the country's single deadliest precinct with 84 murders in one quarter, up 44.8% year on year. The criminal-justice pipeline the DA does not control then swallows the gains: the city says the conviction rate for illegal-firearm cases is around 5%, the Auditor-General has found up to 30% of police data unreliable, and only 22% of South Africans tell the Institute for Security Studies they trust the police at all. And the deeper critique is that visible policing cannot dismantle gangs that function as employers and social institutions in communities the formal economy has abandoned, communities whose joblessness and neglect the province and city could do far more about.
The DA does not command the police, and the national government's thirty-year failure to invest in courts, prisons and detectives in this province is documented and real. But the DA has governed here for a generation, and its own data shows it knows exactly which ten precincts are bleeding. When 983 people die in three months and the response is measured in percentage points, a party cannot simply file the dead under someone else's department.
Housing: the court just ruled against them
The second charge is about who the city is built for, and it no longer comes only from activists. On 3 July 2026 the Constitutional Court handed down a unanimous, precedent-setting judgment: the City of Cape Town and the Western Cape government failed their constitutional obligation to redress apartheid's spatial injustice, the province unlawfully sold the well-located Tafelberg site in Sea Point instead of using it for affordable housing, and the government now has three months to produce a compliant affordable-housing plan. The court's own words: Cape Town remains one of the most spatially divided and unequal cities in the world.
The numbers behind the judgment are stark. More than 300,000 households wait on the backlog inside the city, over 550,000 across the province, and at current delivery rates most will wait longer than a decade. Not one affordable housing unit has been completed in the central city since 1994, across both ANC-era and DA-era administrations. Subsidised homes are still overwhelmingly built on the far urban edge, in places like Mfuleni and Wolwerivier, distant from jobs and transport, which critics argue does not undo apartheid's map so much as extend it. Meanwhile the 2025 property revaluation lifts the city's total rates take by 7%, nearly R1 billion extra in 2026/27, and long-standing residents of gentrifying areas like Woodstock and Bromwell Street have fought eviction through every court in the land.
The city's answer, delivered in Hill-Lewis's re-election platform, is a pipeline: 12,000 affordable units, municipal land releases including the Civic Centre's own parking lot, business rates on commercial short-term rentals to cool the market, and an expanded social housing programme with private partners. Those are real commitments with real numbers attached. But the court's point was about the previous decade, and on the previous decade the record is what it is: the demand curve ran one way, delivery ran the other, and a constitutional obligation went unmet.
This is the deepest criticism of the DA's record, and it is now on the official record too. Constantia enjoys immaculate streets and reliable services; parts of Gugulethu live with sewage and potholes. A government can run clean books and the country's best labour market and still preside over one of the most unequal cities on earth. Whether that inequality is the DA's failure or apartheid's inheritance is precisely the argument the November election will settle.
So, did they do a good job?
Put the evidence on a scale and it does not tip cleanly. The DA's record is not the triumph its billboards claim, nor the failure its fiercest opponents insist on. It is measurably excellent on some things, measurably poor on others, and the two rarely touch the same residents.
Notice how the columns sort themselves. Nearly everything favourable is a task a province or city fully controls: budgets, audits, water pipes, electricity meters. Nearly everything against is either a national function the DA keeps demanding and being denied, like policing, or a structural inheritance, apartheid's map, that no administration created and none has undone. That does not excuse the failures, and the court was explicit that it does not. But it explains how the same government can be a model of administration and a byword for inequality in the same breath, and why both descriptions survive contact with the data.
It depends which Cape Town you live in.
The DA runs a tidy, solvent, well-serviced province, and it runs a city where the poorest bury eleven of their own every day and wait a lifetime for a home. Both sentences are true. A verdict is really a choice about which one you weigh more heavily.
So did the Democratic Alliance do a good job? On the machinery of government, demonstrably yes, and by the widest measurable margin in South Africa. On lifting up the people apartheid left behind, the honest answer is not yet, and the country's highest court has now said so out loud. The DA governs the Western Cape competently and unequally at the same time, and on 4 November voters will decide which of those two truths matters more to them.
Understand the Mother City, block by block
From crime maps and safety ratings to property, energy and the politics that shape daily life, our data-driven Cape Town guides go deeper than the headlines.
Explore capetowndata.comThis article was produced with AI assistance and reviewed and verified by humans.
View DiscussionCharts from this story
The Western Cape took 360,347 of South Africa's 404,712 net new jobs in five years
Nine in every ten of the country’s extra jobs were in one province, which has about an eighth of the population.
Source: Statistics South Africa
Two thirds of Western Cape municipalities earned a clean audit, against 15% nationally
67% of Western Cape municipalities got a clean audit. That is more than four times the national rate of 15%.
Source: Auditor-General of South Africa
The DA holds 24 of the Western Cape's 42 seats, a majority on its own
A party needs 22 seats for a majority. The DA won 24 on its own, and the remaining seats are split between eight parties.
Source: Electoral Commission of South Africa (IEC)